The tyranny is closing in fast now, yet most people are still clueless. Too scared to think for themselves. And even if they have realised that something is desperately wrong with the way the so-called “pandemic” is being handled, they are too scared to say anything.

If you are familiar with my articles, you’ll remember my encounter with “Wave One” in a regional Woolworths store a few years ago. “Wave One” was apparently the implementation of a loss prevention program in Woolworths stores, however it was abundantly clear that it was the first step in a more comprehensive surveillance program. Please read my article on that here. You’ll remember that I was left pondering the following –

“Wave One” of what I wonder? Will “Wave Two” be the actual implementation of such an aggressive surveillance policy? Is “Wave One” just a trial run to see how people will react to it?

I have now discovered what “Wave Two” is, and I was correct. It has taken them four years to make their next move, but last night I discovered that “Wave Two” really is the ACTUAL implementation of a policy where “all transactions are recorded”. LITERALLY RECORDED. Back at the same Woolworths store in regional NSW, I was confronted with surveillance cameras at the self-checkout. No, I’m not talking about cameras mounted on the ceiling directed in the general area of the self-checkouts. No, I’m talking about individual cameras on each self-checkout machine, pointing directly at the customer. Each new self-checkout machine has an integrated camera at the top – just like on a laptop – and there is a window in the top right hand corner of the screen where you can see yourself, in real time.

Livid about this dystopian and unjustifiable invasion of my privacy, I called the supervisor over. I was told that if I didn’t like it I should go to a checkout with an actual cashier. I asked to see a manager. I was told that “people are less likely to steal things if they have a mirror in front of them“. I was then assured – “… but they aren’t recording you!“. “They might not be recording me tonight, but they will probably be recording me next month“. And as usual, when I used the term “police state” all I got was smirks and giggles of ridicule.

God knows how much money has been spent on installing these completely new and unnecessary machines. But what about an actual mirror? If people really do respond positively to the implied surveillance of a “mirror” then why not just use an actual mirror? Would that not have been a much more financially justifiable decision? A couple of dollars per self-checkout rather than probably thousands for each new self-checkout unit?

So there’s the giveaway that there is a much more insidious plan for these cameras. They’ll tell us, yet again, that they are part of a “loss prevention program”, but you don’t have to be too bright to work out what they are for. There are already plenty of ceiling-mounted cameras that can catch people putting items in their bag without scanning them. And in fact the new cameras cannot capture theft because they are trained on your face, not your hands. They are the first step in biometric control of shopping. Linking your biometrics (facial recognition, and then iris scanning and fingerprinting) to your credit card and eventually to the social credit score database. If you are an “approved” citizen you can have your food and other services. If you are “unapproved” you will be denied food, services and everything else.

Eventually you will have to scan your microchipped hand in order to buy anything or go anywhere. Physical money will no longer exist and your digital funds will be cut off anytime the “powers that shouldn’t be” determine that you are “unapproved”. The central database will determine if you can live your life. I alluded to this dystopian future in my recent article here. The central database will be controlled by AI so good luck in trying to appeal your “unapproved” status. I recently discovered just how corrupt the current legal system is – and it is still run by actual people! Once it is largely controlled by AI, there will be no hope of genuine redress once you have been demoted to the status of “the unapproved”.

My education on how corrupt the legal system is goes like this –

I recently received a driving infringement which I considered to be unjust. A mobile phone camera caught me turning off my Bluetooth, but I was charged with “Driver use mobile phone when not permitted”. (Discussing the wording of that offence is a whole article in itself and I’ll leave that for another day.) I am electro-sensitive and I only have Bluetooth on when I am driving and there is a strong chance that my son may need to contact me. That particular day I had forgotten to turn the Bluetooth function off on my phone. Long story short, I started to feel unwell, turned off my Bluetooth, was photographed holding my phone and sent an infringement.

I ended up in court trying to have an adult conversation with the magistrate about the specific safety aspects of my case and the fact that I was not “using” my mobile phone. On a dual carriage motorway there are no pedestrians and no chance of me straying into the path of an oncoming car, so I did not pose a great safety risk to anyone during the two or three seconds it took to turn off Bluetooth. It was a valuable experience because my naivete led me to witness the corrupt Freemason Protection Racket in action. Yes, that is my new term for our so-called “legal system”: the politico-legal system within which we are all enslaved. I witnessed the method by which the whole politico-legal system privileges “the few” and oppresses “the many”.

I witnessed case after case where people prostrated themselves to a person who acted like, and was treated like, a God. Case after case, people grovelled, metered out their most private vulnerabilities, and outlined their dire financial and health secrets – all in an attempt to get the magistrate’s “favour”. All in an attempt to get some leniency from a person who they didn’t know and to whom they owed nothing. It was sickening to watch the charade. Case after case, they prostrated themselves and in return the magistrate gave them a series of reprimands and stern warnings, and eventually a modicum of leniency.

Apparently it is well known that you must treat the magistrate like a God, saying “Yes Sir, no Sir, three bags full Sir”, and agree to every statement and direction made by this person – even when patently false or detrimental – and in return you are rewarded with a miniscule amount of leniency. This charade keeps the “legal system” bloated with cases, it keeps magistrates and court staff in jobs, and it therefore keeps the whole system generously funded by taxpayer dollars. That day I saw case after case proving that this is how the system works.

However that day I also saw two cases stand out in contrast to this script. One, a younger male who was a drug addict, and two, mine. I did not grovel or prostrate myself to this person looking down on me from above. I simply tried to discuss the FACTS of my case like a couple of adults should be able to do. However, part way into my outlining of the facts, I was rudely interrupted. The person looking down on me from above spoke over me so I could not understand what he had said. When he angrily repeated himself I realised that I was being offered a bribe. “Do you want to do a traffic offender course?“. Not a question about the facts I was outlining, no, not even an attempt to engage with me in a discussion, no, but a complete change of direction AWAY from the facts of my case. Indeed a complete obfuscation of the facts and a return to the usual scenario which is you do as I say and there will probably be some leniency.

I made some comments and asked some questions, as I believed I had the right to do – “I’m sorry, I don’t know what a traffic offender course is” and “Could you please explain the implications for me if I do the course and if I don’t do the course“. Such insolence is clearly rare and was not appreciated. After being given a brochure to learn what a traffic offender course is, I determined that there would be no benefit for me to do the course. I do not drink and drive, I do not do drugs, and I have previously completed several advanced driver training programs – all of the aspects of driving that the course covered. The person looking down on me from above was gobsmacked when I eventually declined his bribe.

Long story short, I was read the riot act about how I had treated the law and the court with contempt. The person looking down on me from above informed me that he should suspend my licence for my lack of remorse for posing such a serious risk to other drivers. My fine was increased by $101 without explanation, and a raft of other court levies were added to my fine – also without explanation – so that I now owe nearly double the original fine. This in contrast to most other cases that day where the fines were reduced because the guilty grovelled.

In contrast yet again is the case of the drug addict. And here is where the corrupt Freemason Protection Racket became clearly visible. The tone and manner of the person looking down on us from above changed dramatically when this young man’s case was heard. This young man had a history of drugs and driving – far more dangerous offences than any of the other cases heard that day. However, all we heard from the person looking down on us from above was a long list of the great achievements of this young man, his genuine attempt to rid himself of his habit, his pathology results showing a “clean” record for X number of months, etc.

The piece de resistance came when the person looking down on us from above came to read his conclusion – the young man will get a small amount of leniency but will still have to serve a short suspension period for his crime. Of course, justice had to be “seen” to be done. The young man then began his pre-agreed grovelling, after which the person looking down on us from above ACTUALLY said the following – “Well, sometimes it pays for a person to continue talking, to continue to plead their case“. The whole charge was then dismissed. It was a pre-orchestrated charade like no other. Clearly the young man had either recently joined the local lodge or he knew a freemason in it. I’ve heard about this network before, I know of other cases where similar agreements have been made, and I am watching it slowly play out in another area of my life, but that day I saw it in action. In plain sight.

This is the real purpose of the politico-legal system. To privilege those “in the know” and to keep the rest of us oppressed. It’s the barrier between the privileged few and the “useless eaters”. It’s the method by which the privilege is created. Do you know anyone who has come away from a legal battle and considers that “justice” was done? How many times have we seen someone “in the know” walk away from a serious charge? George Pell. The current Christian Porter scandal. The current Netanyahu scandal. The Biden election scandal. Maxwell and Epstein. Hollywood paedophiles in general – any of them, just pick one. Our tax dollars are funding a system that keeps those “in the know” above the law, and keeps the rest of us at it’s mercy.

So what’s the relationship between “the powers that shouldn’t be” AKA “the few”, and the Freemason order? Freemasons are, by and large, a network of useful idiots who can’t get through life on their own merits. They are made to feel that they are in a “special club” whereby they unwittingly do the bidding of those at the top – “the few” – and in return are given favourable outcomes and a “helping hand” through life. The masonic occult spiritual practices reinforce the “special” nature of their membership. Freemasons are found mostly in the politico-legal system and they are the foot soldiers who are helping to implement the dystopian goals of “the few”. In all fairness, most freemasons are unaware of what they have gotten themselves into until it is too late. However, for freemasons like Scott Morrison and pretty much all senior members of government, the executive and the judiciary in all countries, they know exactly what they are doing. Trudeau, Macron, Biden, Trump, Boris Johnson, Dan Andrews, even our comrade across the ditch, Ardern – they all know exactly what role they are playing. They might not all technically be freemasons, however they were all put on the fast track to leadership at the point in their careers when, similar to the higher masonic degrees, they demonstrated their willingness to be corrupted.

It really is time to wake up. The politico-legal system that rules the world was set up to oppress us. If you are not “in the know” then you are the target of the system. Most of us have matured enough to realise that the two-party political system is a charade; that no matter who has been elected into power we always get the same policies imposed on us. It’s time now for us to mature a little further and wake up to the fact that this is exactly how the politico-legal system works on the world stage as well. It’s time to wake up to the fact that the concept of the “good superpower” and the “rogue state” is also a charade. One only need to take a look at how much time people like Henry Kissenger and Maurice Strong spent in China. Strong in particular had very strong connections to the CCP, as did his cousin Anna Louise Strong. Similarly, it is also time for World War II and the “Cold War” charade to be better understood. The work of Antony Sutton has documented the largely unknown relationships between the US and the USSR, and the US and Nazi Germany. His series of books titled “Western Technology & Soviet Economic Development” and his books “National Suicide: Military Aid to the Soviet Union” and “Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution” outline the technology, equipment and aid given to the USSR by the US during the period 1917 to 1965. Similarly his book “Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler” outlines the financial support given to the Nazi Party by Wall Street financiers and other international bankers.These corrupt relationships have been fostered and used to oppress the many. War is NOT about bringing democracy to anyone. War is about furthering the geopolitical objectives of the few. Our sons die in rich men’s wars so that a small number of already wealthy men can firstly, increase their wealth, but most importantly, gain more control over large swathes of land, people and resources. The current war mongering with China is a charade. When the war mongering with Russia failed, they simply had to find a new perceived enemy to keep the population in fear. It is simply another strategy they have up their sleeve to remove more of our rights and freedoms, and to further bring us to our knees so that “the few” can implement their dystopian global Marxist dictatorship that the United Nations has been quietly working on since it replaced the League of Nations after WWII.

The League of Nations was the organisation set up after WWI to formally begin the implementation the Marxist “New World Order”. Russia and China are not “rogue states”. The Bolshevik Revolution/Soviet Union and Communist China have been “trial runs” on how to implement global tyranny. Watch G. Edward Griffin’s series of interviews with Norman Dodd here to fully understand the relationship between Communism and the west. Communism/socialism has been the socio-political tool used by “the few” to implement control over the many, and they are currently making their boldest move to date in trying to control and enslave us. To widen the gap between the haves and the have-nots by implementing their Marxist agenda worldwide under the guise of a global health emergency.

The “pandemic” is the current excuse to increase surveillance, to remove more of our rights, and to destroy our livelihoods. We will be told that they are installing biometric surveillance in supermarkets, public transport, public places, etc. to prevent the unva**inated from spreading “the virus”. However the real intent is to obtain total control over the population – initially to force everyone to take the jab because otherwise you won’t be able to buy food or even leave your home. Next it will be a cyber attack, the planned collapse of the financial system, an attack by a “rogue state”, extreme weather events – any number of possible scenarios that have already been injected into the narrative to alert us to what’s coming, and all to gain more and more control over the population and the planet. It’s all in plain sight.

NORAD war games on 9/11. Dark Winter. Bombing simulation drills in the London Underground on 7/7. Event 201.

These are all simulations that at some point went live. Cyber Polygon is the next simulation. It is being held on July 9th – only one month away. Did you know that the World Economic Forum, the elite think tank who are currently implementing The Great Reset across the globe, have a Centre for Cyber Security? Did you know that the World Economic Forum’s Centre for Cyber Security supports Cyber Polygon? Do you know what Cyber Polygon is? Maybe it’s time to find out, and to determine for yourself where it fits in in relation to other simulations that went live.

Once you educate yourself on these issues you will realise that surveillance cameras at Woolworths are, in the big picture, the least of our worries. But they are the next step in the totalitarian tip toe, and each time we allow such tyranny to go unaddressed we are effectively allowing those “in the know” to oppress us and enslave us. That’s how they do it. If we don’t fight back en masse they consider that we have agreed to our own enslavement. We have free will, after all. If an individual tries to fight back, the corrupt and oppressive system of control will quickly silence them – censor them, dismiss their grievances, incarcerate them, ridicule them or ostracise them in some other way. Even murder them. In order to fight this tyranny we need to fight back as a group. We need numbers. We need masses of people to wake up and to be prepared to verbally, physically, and in every other way, reject this tyranny outright

We need to recognise and overcome the divide-and-conquer tactics that have been employed over the past few decades for the purpose of dividing communities and families so we pose less of a risk of retaliation. Beginning with simple programs such as the “Civil Rights Movement” in the 60s and “Second Wave Feminism” in the 70s, artificial divisions have been created in society based on race, sex, religion, politics, age, sexuality/gender orientation, and now so-called “health status”. Our societies are now divided more than ever, due to state/corporate propaganda that has been used to create disagreements and animosity that would not otherwise have occurred. A community at war with itself cannot unite against the real enemy. We need to understand that all of the battles we are fighting have been fabricated, and we need to unite if we are going to win the war.

There are more of us than there are of them. We are the 99%. If we don’t use our free will and our strength in numbers, our kids will eventually become enslaved automatons for the elite, with no ability to express their God-given perfection. They will be told that it’s “cool” to upgrade themselves cybernetically. That transhumanism is the way of the future; that they will be super intelligent, super strong and super successful. They will be told that anyone who dissents from this line of thinking is dangerous. For all the hype and encouragement they are given, all that will eventuate is that they will become the gammas, deltas and epsilons of the Brave New World that has been in the pipeline for centuries. The Brave New World that has as its primary goal, the end of humanity as we know it. The Brave New World that has been meticulously planned by Rockefeller-funded think tanks such as the United Nations. The Brave New World that is currently being rapidly implemented by the World Economic Forum and its cronies.

(If this information is too challenging to your world view, it’s time to upgrade your understanding of how the world really works. Watch these clips here, here and here to get a better understanding of what’s really going on. It’s imperative that more people realise the future that has been planned for humanity so we have a chance to stop it in its tracks.)

Is this the future you want for your kids?

What are you going to do about it?

Maybe it’s time to support me, and people like me, when we make a scene in public by refusing to accept tyranny.

Maybe it’s time to refuse to be locked down; time to keep your businesses open, time to keep travelling and associating freely.

Maybe it’s time to do what most people are too scared to do –


The Silencing of Climate Change Dissent

(UPDATED: OCT 2018)  The politics of climate change hit me square in the face last week. BOOM! Right between the eyes. And I really wasn’t expecting it.

I know that whenever I write about climate change it makes peopleClimateIrony uncomfortable and defensive. It’s a given. All those good people truly believing they are doing the right thing by eagerly repeating the global warming and sustainable development mantras. Truly good people. All without ever doing any actual reading of any literature themselves. Good, but sadly misled. I think the technical term for it is “groupthink”.

Anyways, there I was calmly having an exchange with a “believer” over an article he had written about one of those pesky “deniers”. As usual the article was nothing more than an ad hominem against an intelligent well informed man – this time it was Mark Steyn – who dares to question climate change/climate disruption/global warming propaganda. In the most extraordinary example of doublethink I have seen for a while the article managed to suggest that Steyn shares David Icke’s views on Reptilians whilst simultaneously printing Steyn’s own words that “David Icke is a weirdo“. DavidIckeAnd I do believe that the author actually got away with it. Sheer brilliance. I am familiar with Icke’s work and I came away from the article feeling that Steyn’s reputation had been tarnished and he was forever associated with Icke’s more radical ideas – ideas that require quite a sophisticated understanding of geopolitics in order to comprehend them accurately. Edward Bernays would be so proud. Give the man a medal. Pronto. A mind-blowing degree of deceptiveness heretofore unknown by this little chickadee.

But wait. There’s more. Much more. That wasn’t the thing that smacked me out of my naiveté. After a few exchanges I could feel the obligatory ad hominem on me begin to take form. So I calmly and very adult-like stated that “I don’t engage in back & forth personal attack. I just point people to the info which is confronting to read” (quoted verbatim). I had already supplied information on a couple of very good books which outline climate change fraud, presuming that the author and the online publication who published his article would want to investigate. Because that’s what journalists do. That’s what journalists without an agenda do, anyway. Not so for these people. I soon discovered that I had been blocked on Twitter by this publication. A so-called independent Australian news organisation who “supports quality investigative journalism, as well as citizen journalism and a diversity of voices. It believes Australians are short-changed by the mass media — and so it dedicates itself to seeking out the truth and informing the public” (quoted verbatim from their website). Hmmm. And the next day the same publication posted an article on freedom of speech. PROMOTING freedom of speech. Double hmmm.

These are the types of incidents along the path to wisdom that help us to understand what’s really going on. When you sit back and lazily believe the detritus that spews out every day from the TV and newspapers you don’t have a chance of working it out. But if you actively engage in searching for truth you open the door to epiphanies such as the one I had last week. It was truly a blessing in disguise as it helped me to further get a handle on the disturbing politics of climate change. It’s a subject I care about passionately. Because I’m passionate about the truth. As a child I learned to value the truth.

I grew up in the 60s, 70s and 80s. It was such a great time to be a kid. The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) hadn’t yet decimated the education system in Australia so we were raised on a diet of tried-and-tested accurate information contained within a politically-neutral curriculum. We were taught critical thinking and useful life skills. We weren’t propagandised with politically-biased issues and told what to think about them. We were taught to gather the facts, analyse the issues for ourselves and make up our own minds. Freedom of thought was business-as-usual.
Genuine environmental issues such as pollution and deforestation were absolutely not part of the curriculum. Yet we Gen-Xers have been enthusiastically using our recycle bins for decades. How can that be? It can be because we were raised to be thinking individuals. Back then we were taught to have a grip on our sense of freedom and our PollutionPplasticown volition in the world. Even without guidance from the United Nations (UN) we could see for ourselves that filling the world with plastic was not viable.

But UNESCO has put an end to critical thinking and freedom of thought. Gen-Y (Millennials) and Gen-Z (iGen) have been raised on a diet of pro-climate change, pro-sustainable development and pro-humans-are-the-problem-not-the-solution. They are “global citizens” who go to UN-funded and run “Model United Nations” conferences where they are taught that the UN will save the world – with their help. And seeing as most kids are genuinely good-at-heart, they believe it. Because they have to believe it. To give themselves a sense of having a future worth living they have to believe the hype. They are the saviours who are going to fix the misdeeds of their parents. Because the UN said so.
And as time has marched on it appears that some of us Gen-Xers have fallen for this UN propaganda that holds us all responsible for the impending end of the earth. Some of us have been turned into automatons who just repeat, parrot-fashion, that the world is doomed and anyone who questions the “official version” is a traitor to be reviled. And silenced. Without even having a critical thought about the information we are being fed. What went wrong?

I had an appointment recently with an intelligent successful professional Gen-Xer. She apologised for being late, saying that she had a situation at home that needed to be dealt with. She had maggots in the kitchen and her partner told her it was “because of climate change”.

Intelligent and successful.

Maggots in the kitchen.

Climate change.

And apparently we now have climate-induced financial distress, climate-induced war and catastrophic conflicts, a climate-induced explosion in viruses, climate-this, climate-that……it just goes on and on. And on. And very few of us are questioning it. While Al Gore and his already-wealthy cronies are making gazillions out of carbon credits we are all being punished with higher power bills, less property rights, less democratic representation with mega-councils (the first step on the path to global governance) …. all because there is apparently more carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere than before the Industrial Revolution. More of a substance that is essential for life on earth. Essential for the growth of trees. Yes, toxic CO2. The substance that is 4% of what we breathe out every few seconds. The substance that is currently 0.04% of the atmosphere. But they call it “carbon” so people don’t wake up to the fact that they are demonising a harmless, vital substance.

Scientists who have studied geological history know that current CO2 levels of 400ppm MedievalWarmPeriodare much lower than for most of the history of life on earth. Four hundred and fifty million years ago the earth went into an Ice Age when CO2 levels exceeded 4000ppm – more than TEN TIMES the current concentration. Just Google “Medieval Warm Period” and see what you find. Your eyes will be opened when you read some legitimate science.

And have you ever wondered why the media never mention any NATURAL causes of climate change/climate disruption/global warming ? It’s because the organisations tasked with “investigating” climate change/climate disruption/global warming are PREVENTED from finding out if there are any natural phenomena causing the purported disruptions in global climate patterns. Yes, in 1988 the United Nations set up an investigative body called the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and their terms of reference SPECIFICALLY EXCLUDE the investigation of natural causes of climate variability. The IPCC publication “Principles Governing IPCC Work”  states that the IPCC will assess –

  1. the risk of human-induced climate change,
  2. its potential impacts, and
  3. possible options for prevention.

Using this limited framework of reference, the IPCC have published so-called “comprehensive” assessment reports in 1990 (with a supplementary report in 1992), 1995, 2001, 2007 and 2014. The sixth report is due in 2022. These incomplete reports areClimateFraud used to determine global responses to climate variability and more disturbingly, they are used to enforce regulations and restrictions on the population. These so-called “comprehensive” reports determine our future quality of life even though none of the reports address naturally-induced causes of climate variability. This is not legitimate science. This is an agenda being imposed on the entire population. The IPCC have deliberately misled the world about the nature and cause of climate variability for a political agenda. And thankfully more and more scientists are waking up to these fundamental problems with “climate science” – see more here, here, here and here

And guess what? Agenda-free scientists have discovered that global temperature patterns vary directly with SOLAR activity.

So temperature is dependent on…. wait for it…. THE SUN!

Who knew???

It’s heartbreaking for me to see good people sucked into this global deception. It’s heartbreaking for me to see intelligent people manipulated by greedy insiders and their bizarre global governance agenda. Whilst we good people suffer restrictive “sustainable development” plans and programs, these wealthy powerful global bureaucrats make even more restrictive decisions based on manipulated data and remain completely without oversight. I remain in awe at how mainstream media has been used to manipulate good people into hating those of us who dare to question the climate change/climate disruption/global warming agenda. The utter demonisation of individuals who dare to do a basic part of science – to question and test hypotheses – is a frightening step in the wrong direction.


That the media have managed to brainwash good people into devaluing an integral part of “doing science” – not to mention an integral part of a free and open society – is very troubling. That so-called “independent” media who claim to support a diversity of voices are also leading the way in demonising those of us who question climate change politics is indeed troubling. It’s an assault on freedom. It’s an assault on democracy. It shows just how powerful those behind climate change politics actually are. And if there’s one thing I’ve learned in my 50 years on the planet, it’s that if a person or organisation refuses to openly debate and defend the agenda they are pushing, and they bully you into accepting their position by ridiculing you for questioning it, it certainly doesn’t pass the sniff test. In other words, something stinks.

But the buck stops with us. We are the only ones who can get off our reality-TV-addicted bottoms and actively search out the truth. Up until quite recently I was a “believer”. But in the course of my own personal research I came across more and more literature telling me that global warming was a hoax. Initially I was very uncomfortable that some ofReadThinkLearn my favourite independent journalists were “deniers”. How could this be? How could he/she get this one so wrong? And then I read some more. And when I came across more information that made me more uncomfortable I read even more. And when the penny finally dropped it rocked my world.

It’s not easy to face the fact that, as George Carlin so eloquently taught us, “the government doesn’t give a f**k about you“. But it’s the truth. A f**k they certainly do not give. It is not a priority of our government to furnish us with accurate unbiased information. See more here. And based on the research I have done over the past few years, it’s even less of a priority for the UN to deliver agenda-free factual information to their “global citizens”.

The politics of climate change really are quite disturbing. My experience last week showed me just how deep the deception goes; how quickly the lid is put on someone trying to calmly, respectfully and intelligently share dissenting information. Those of us who have uncovered the truth really struggle for opportunities to distribute information to the wider ClimateChangecommunity. We put all our efforts into social media and blogspots, struggling to retain followers. However, once Facebook, Twitter, You Tube or Google register that we are disseminating alternative views we have restricted-reach algorithms imposed on us (also known as “shadow-banning”) or we are accused of “fake news” and our accounts are deleted altogether. Some more seasoned and successful researchers manage to build a following of paid-up subscribers which allows them to produce high quality journalism. My hope is that people will start to wake up for themselves; that the outrageous claims now being made in the name of climate change will be enough for my fellow Gen-Xers’ critical thought to kick back in again. When a lie just keeps getting bigger and more outrageous, there comes a point when it becomes so implausible that we can no longer believe it without question. Maybe it’s not maggots in the kitchen, but maybe by the time we have travel restrictions imposed on us (using travel surveillance via your sat-nav) and power restrictions are a daily expectation (using power usage surveillance via your smart meter) whilst multinationals continue to profit from the manufacture of unnecessary planet-polluting products such as bottled water and coffee pods, maybe then people might start to question the reality of climate change.

Maybe then they’ll start to use what’s left of their

critical thought and democratic rights.